IEEEVR 2017 Highlight

The IEEE Virtual Reality 2017 conference was held in Los Angeles from March 18th to 22nd. I was lucky to attend the exciting conference. Our team from Johns Hopkins University have three poster presentations. Here in this post, I would love to share some highlights and interesting projects that I saw during the conference.

Virtual Reality is such a popular terminology these years, with more and more revolutionary products, cool demos, and potential application domains. IEEEVR is undoubtedly the top conference in this technology domain. The papers, posters and demos at IEEEVR represent the most recent breakthroughs in the research of VR. Some of them are selected and briefly described in this post. You can definitely refer to the full proceedings of IEEEVR 2017 when they are available.


SEARIS (Software Engineering and Architectures for Realtime Interactive Systems) is one of the workshops held at IEEEVR on Sunday. A panel “Big metal VR in the HMD and Unity era” attracted the attention of many researchers, including me. The big metal VR here means CAVE.

A cave automatic virtual environment (better known by the recursive acronym CAVE) is an immersive virtual reality environment where projectors are directed to between three and six of the walls of a room-sized cube.

CAVE was one of the major representatives of Virtual Reality technology for a long time. However, as indicated in the name of the panel, VR entered the “HMD and Unity era”, pretty much since the appearance of good HMDs, for example, Oculus. VR and AR work based on projectors are becoming rare. Apparently, CAVE technology is experiencing a hard time. Researchers attending this panel had very heated discussion about the current situation and future of CAVE.

Several years ago, head-mounted display was not as mature as today. People thought HMDs were too bulky, expensive, and ergonomically uncomfortable for VR experiences. CAVE was absolutely the choice for VR applications. It has been widely used in applications like military training. However, engineers tackled the problems quickly, and HMDs bring VR out of the labs, to the general consumer market. HMDs are cheap, easily accessible, and powerful. On the other hand, CAVE is still difficult to setup. Careful calibration is involved to guarantee comfortable experience for the users. More spaces are needed. It is much more expensive, compared to HMDs.

Still, CAVE has its unique advantage over HMDs. It provides natural environment for shared VR experience. A well-calibrated CAVE provides better immersive feelings. If you have tried some Disneyland attractions, for example, Soaring Over the Horizon, you will know that CAVE is still great.

Just like very few people could predit the current popularity of HMDs several years ago, advancement in CAVE technology is able to bring people’s faith back.

Interesting Papers

  • Efficient Hybrid Image Warping for High Frame-Rate Stereoscopic Rendering @Paper
  • Paint with Me: Stimulating Creativity and Empathy While Painting with a Painter in Virtual Reality @Paper @Page
  • Recognition and Mapping of Facial Expressions to Avatar by Embedded Photo Reflective Sensors in Head Mounted Display
  • Wide Field Of View Varifocal Near-Eye Display Using See-Through Deformable Membrane Mirrors @Paper @Page
    • Best Paper Award

(This selection is based on my personal interest.)

Interesting Posters

  • Monocular Focus Estimation Method for a Freely-Orienting Eye using Purkinje-Sanson Images
  • The AR-Rift 2 Prototype @Page
  • Estimating the Motion-to-Photon Latency in Head Mounted Displays
  • Hand Gesture Controls for Image Categorization in Immersive Virtual Environments
  • Resolution-Defined Projections for Virtual Reality Video Compression
  • A Methodology for Optimized Generation of Virtual Environments Based on Hydroelectric Power Plants
  • Robust Optical See-Through Head-Mounted Display Calibration: Taking Anisotropic Nature of User Interaction Errors into Account
    • Our poseter wons the Honorable Mention for Best Poster

Interesting Research Demos

  • Diminished Hand: A Diminished Reality-Based Work Area Visualization @Video
  • 3DPS: An Auto-calibrated Three-Dimensional Perspective-Corrected Spherical Display @Video
  • mpCubee: Towards a Mobile Perspective Cubic Display using Mobile Phones
  • Towards Ad Hoc Mobile Multi-display Environments on Commodity Mobile Devices @Video

IEEEVR is full of fun and innovative ideas. It is also very good to see more and more Chinese researchers and engineers in this field.

Thanks for reading! LQ

Hands on Head-Mounted Displays

I have worked with many augmented reality platforms, especially Head-Mounted Displays (HMD).

In this post, I would like to share my experience of developing or playing with these devices. Hopefully, this will help you to make the correct decision about which HMD to choose for your specific application.

Table of Content

  • Epson Moverio BT-200
  • Epson Moverio BT-300
  • Meta 1
  • ODG R-6
  • ODG R-7
  • Microsoft HoloLens
  • Google Glass
  • Google Cardboard
  • Google Tango
  • Pupil-Labs
  • Oculus Rift DK2 for AR
  • ……

Epson Moverio BT-200

Epson Moverio BT-200 is the first head-mounted display that I worked with, and that was 2 years ago. It is a pretty good HMD to start with, because it has all the fundamental components of an AR HMD: stereoscopic beam-splitter optical display, front-facing camera, IMU, programming interface (Android). Programmers and researchers can do most of the things that they want with BT-200. However, its performance is not very satisfying if your expectation is high. Its field-of-view is very narrow; the front-facing camera is not high quality; it is not powerful in terms of computation.

Given the fact that it appears on the market quite early (3 years ago), and its relatively low price at that time, BT-200 is a reasonable choice for a long time until the appearance of its succesor BT-300.

Epson Moverio BT-300

Epson Moverio BT-300 appears on the market at the end of 2016. We received it after almost one-year waiting after the pre-order. It inherited most of Moverio BT-200 features, but with huge improvemnet in most aspects.

  • The screen resolution and illuminace is enhanced
  • The front-facing camera quality is much better
  • Lighter
  • Much more computational power
  • Support glasses
  • Better fixture with repsect to user’s head

More surprisingly, the price is still the same as BT-200, which makes it very appealing under budget.

Meta 1

Meta 1 is developed by MetaVision Inc, a relatively small but focused team. The idea of Meta 1 is treating the head-mounted display as an external monitor of the computer. In other words, Meta 1 does not have on-chip computation capcability, and should be always tethered to the computer. However, this sacrifice brings clear advantages. Meta 1 has a RGBD front-facing camera, enabling more advanced tracking and interaction with its applications, and since it is using PC’s computation resources, it could perform much more complicated algorithms at runtime, that would not be possible without powerful GPUs.

Meta 1 appears on the market 4 years ago, and noticeably, the stereoscopic beam-splitter optical design of Meta 1 is same as that of Moverio BT-200.

Therefore, if your application does not involve people freely walking around, Meta 1 is good choice. Meta 2 is already available now. Similarly, Meta is also tethered HMD, but with an impressively wide-FOV holographic display.


ODG R-6 is manufactured by Osterhout Group Inc. My experience with ODG R-6 is not good, because the device assumes a narrower head than mine, and it basically cannot be put on my head at all. Apparently, the company sees the the problem and the R-7 is much more comfortable to wear.


ODG R-7 is the successor of ODG R-6. ODG R-7 is more ergonomical friendly, and also slightly more powerful than ODG R-6. The optical design of R-7 and R-6 is same. They operate on a customized Android, called ReticleOS. The mechanical design of them is quite unique, with magnetic connectors everywhere. The front-facing RGB camera is of high quality as well.

However, there is one particular issue with ODG devices, after being used for a while, the device becomes hot. Even though the performance of the device is still normal, it at least makes users uncomfortable or feeling unsafe.

Microsoft HoloLens

From my opinion, Microsoft HoloLens is the most fascinating HMD at present, and is also the HMD that I used most. HoloLens is part of a large project at Microsoft, and is the joint effort of Window Holographic System, Microsoft Holographic Processing Unit (HPU), Universal Windows Platform, and the SLAM (Simultaneous Localization and Mapping) research at Microsoft.

The spatial mapping of HoloLens is probably the most stable SLAM system I have ever seen. It enables the user to place holograms in the room, and staying at the same location however the user moves. This capability makes world-anchored augmented reality applications super easy to implement.

The optics design of HoloLens is special among many off-the-shelf displays, with four waveguides combined and refreshed at 240Hz. The focal plane of HoloLens is close to 1m. With the motion cue provided by spatial mapping, user is able to feel that the virtual objects are fixed at variable distances. However, since there is no official documentation about its optics, and Microsoft markets HoloLens as Holographic waveguide technology, we are not sure about what is exactly going on beneath the goggle.

HoloLens is using Universal Windows Platform, an Operating System that Microsoft develops for portable devices. The APIs are quite complete and well-documented. It is well-integrated with Unity3D game engine. Making applications with Unity3D to run on HoloLens is already stable, in addition, the native programming interface in Unity3D enables more advanced use of low-level .NET or DirectX features. I build a package, HoloLensARToolKit, taking advantage of it.

Of course HoloLens has its problems, it is heavy; the learning curve is XXX; it is expensive compared to other HMDs.

Google Glass

Google starts early in AR, and built maybe the most famous HMD, Google Glass. When we try to explain to people the concept of head-mounted display, we always say ‘Google Glass is an AR HMD’, and people will suddenly understand. Google Glass is famous, but not successful. If we look at medical application involving head-mounted display, there are many early researches and papers dedicated to it.

Google Cardboard

Cardboard v1

Cardboard v2

Google Cardboard 1 and 2 are virtual reality headsets. It is an impressive idea to take advantage of the popularity of smartphones to make VR applications accessible to everyone. It is not a complicated task to develop VR applications with Google Cardboard, using the GVR SDK. The interaction with Google Cardboard is very limited as a tradeoff for its simplicity. For Cardboard 1, there is a magnetic trigger, and for Cardboard 2, there is a touch buttom. IMU is required for navigation in the VR environment. I have another post depicting more details about my experience with Google Cardboard.

Google Daydream is the successor for Google Cardboard, in my opinion, with more methods of interaction, and elegant design. But it still remains unknown to me how much can this product achieve.

Google Tango

Google Tango is another Google product related to augmented reality. It is a tablet instead of a HMD. Tango is an experiment with SLAM on mobile devices. Contrary to what Microsoft is doing, Google focuses more on mobile market, because of the potential of introducing AR infrastructure to Android devices. The first Tango-based smartphone, Lenovo Phab 2 Pro, was released last year. I believe it is only the beginning.

The SLAM experience with Tango is not as good as HoloLens for me, I think one of the difference is that, HoloLens environmental understanding cameras covers a significantly larger volumne.


JINS is a large eyewear manufacturer based in Japan. JINS MEME is a piece of eyewear integrated with some electrooculography sensors. It is able to sense the motion of human eyeball. As can be seen from the picture, JINS MEME is very well designed. It is almost the same as a normal pair of glasses.

You can monitor the raw sensor data via network. Efforts are needed to give meaning to the raw data. For example, if you want to detect the motion of eye, then a training procedure is essential. The stability and feasibility of using electrooculography sensing data for interaction is not yet proven.


Pupil-labs is a startup company based in Berlin, Germany. The main product of the team is the head-mounted eye-tracking hardware and software. The eyewear frame is 3D-printed, modular-designed; the software is open-source; the plugin interface is very easy to use. Their products are quite modern in many senses. Compared with Tobii, pupil-labs is more open and accessible, although the tracking accuracy might not be as good. You can find all its code on Github, from pupil tracking algorithm, to the software infrastructure.

In addition, pupil-labs comes up with the integration with many AR / VR devices, for example, Moverio BT-300, Oculus Rift, and HoloLens.

I enjoyed using and programming with pupil-labs eye-tracker for its beautiful hardware and software! Here is a Github repository pupil_ros_plugin), to build the bridge between pupil-labs and ROS.

Oculus Rift DK2 for AR

This image shows a customized Oculus Rift DK2 that was done in our lab two years ago. Oculus Rift DK2 is an extremely successful VR headset. By equipting two fish-eye cameras, it is turned to be a video see-through HMD, that is suitable for many AR applications. It is tethered to PC as usual, requiring high-end computer configuration, wide field-of-view, and is easy to program. AR HMDs are typically divided into two categories: optical see-through (OST) and video see-through (VST). VST-HMD has the advantage of good registration between virtuality and reality. We developed a lot of demos using this system.

The drawbacks are quite obvious as well: there are too many cables making the workspace very cumbersome; the processing requirement is very demanding; VST-HMD is not fail-safe for many real-life applications, for example in medical scenarios.

The Waitlist


As you may see, there are many HMDs come into the arena these years. However, the technology is still far from perfect. None of these devices is absolutely better than anyone else. Tradeoffs exist in many aspects: tethered v.s. non-tethered, OST v.s. VST, binocular v.s. holographic, etc. It is very important for users to identify the exact need and make best choices among all these tradeoffs.

I would like to thank Alexander Barthel for taking many of the photos above, and feel free to use them.

Thanks for reading! LQ